|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It’s not the way your mother made. He meant the Yorkshire pudding and the light but crusty comment rose perfectly to complement his well-pressed gabardine and tie.
It pleased him, on his birthday, to be distinguished from the shirtsleeved open-necked and untucked uniformity of Sunday pubs favoured by his son-in-law.
His daughter, turning forty, was growing more and more familiar and worrying his memory; he thoughtfully allowed himself to take that second glass of beer her mother would have frowned at.
When I heard the way they’d treated you I wanted, very calmly, to crush my glass against the table top.
And that would testify I hadn’t anything to do with them - not the border clerks who fingered through your papers, nor the authors of their picklock questions, shaped to make the wrong replies slide out like bolts drawn slowly back across a trapdoor.
I wanted to shout down their smug assumption of my mute agreement to brand you, steal your clothes and make you dance. Denials alone won’t do for those who make their own small ugly choices. I needed, very simply, to know if God could answer the question of how far the likes of us should take an inkling of complicity when we remember how they treated you.
Suppose that in the first row of a year-ten maths class there exists a student with a folder whose cover sports, in colour, an A4 fully-frontal nude.
Is it necessary and sufficient to use only body language to eliminate this element? Or should there be a formal proof to justify its cancellation?
I’d like you all to pause and try this as a worked example. Substitute yourself into the standard formula and see what answer you obtain; and then attempt the problem once again,
with extra data. Let g, the student’s gender, equal female; with s, the model’s sex, quite positively male. Now in this case does your result come out to be the same?
When she set the kettle on the hob the squeaky whisper, like a voice from far away along a speaking tube, oddly troubled her; and children, playing loudly near the stove, got scolded.
As on many other mornings, she rehearsed the fact she had a husband who was hidden by horizons. His sunrise did not synchronise with hers, and what was Now for him was lost to her in tricks with clocks; so, afterwards, she could not tell if, as it happened, his distress had called its way to her.
The hull gulped water through an opened mouth, astonished at the horned black secret blurted out to interrupt the quiet discourse between screws and sea. An inrush from the sun-struck Indian Ocean eventually would quench the superheated steam that hit the bulkheads, shrieking, as the boilers went.
But, for Thomas, it came neither chill nor quick enough to save his skin – and had it done, it must have quenched him too, far below the water line, a dozen lung-tight ladders from good air.
His death certificate was terse with three cold words across a final column – his wife discouraged from discussing overmuch of what her husband knew.
|
|
©
of
all poems featured on this site remains with the
poet |
